Tag: Sharia

Feminists and Sharia

No Comments

September 17, 2010 at 7:59 amCategory:Uncategorized

Imagine a place where…

- Women are inferior to men.

- Women should have fewer rights and responsibilities than Larry the Cable Guy.

- Women count for one-half of a man in giving evidence in a court of law.

- Women should be whipped if they ever make their husband feel like he does not want to feel (because it is always the woman's fault).

- Women are told and forced to marry someone, what to wear, where to live, denied education, and cannot escape a cheating /abusive husband. Those husbands are allowed multiple wives and even "temporary" wives, aka prostitutes.

- Girls can be wed and raped at the age of nine.They can be married off as young as one year!

Yes, such a lovely place called Sharia. And it is moving to a city near you!

Given Islam’s enslavement of women and the Sharia erection of the Cordoba Initiative’s chief con man, Abdul Rauf, you’d think N.O.W. would now be raising more rabble about this Ground Zero Mosque than they are about Sarah Palin.

But not so. Why?

Nope, We are not hearing a whole heck of a lot from the fiery feminists regarding this Ground Zero affront and what it could entail for the girls among us. Just silence from those who pride themselves on protecting women’s rights.

We've been sold down the river. What a farce.

Share

Muslim Roots

No Comments

August 26, 2010 at 8:52 amCategory:Islamo-Facism | Obama

There are multiple reasons that 24+ percent of Americans believe President Obama is a Muslim: he is always on the campaign trail for Islam. He proselytizes for Islamic goals and dreams like a member of the faithful.

He endlessly recounts his background to establish his street creds with the Muslim world. "I am a Christian, but my father came from a Kenyan family that includes generations of Muslims," he told a Muslim audience in Cairo. "As a boy, I spent several years in Indonesia and heard the call of the azaan at the break of dawn and the fall of dusk. … I have known Islam on three continents before coming to the region where it was first revealed."

And it is true. Our memories from the youngest ages stay with us and always feel familiar and like "home." In this regard he is a Muslim and identifies with Islam.

One could argue whether this was preferable to the hatred emanating from Rev Wright's so-called "church" and Liberation Theology Marxist teachings. When did Jesus ever spew hatred? When did he ever claim that anyone different form Him was putrid, unclean and could not be touched? When did He call for the eradication of other religions?

The answer is never and there is your major difference between Christianity and Islam. One calls for forgiveness and love. The other calls for hatred and conquest.

While Obama continues to proclaim to the Muslim world, "I am on your side" and heralding his Muslim parentage on Muslim soil, speaking of Islam's "revelation," talking about living in a Muslim country, Americans scratch their heads in confusion.

In Cairo, Obama said his job as president of the United States is to "fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear." Is that his job as President of the United States? How about dumping the idiot economists you have their and really bring jobs back?

Obama's bow to the navel of the Saudi king, the leader of the most Sharia country, where women cannot drive, have to be swathed in black with only eyes showing, should raise a warning flag.

American leaders do not bow before foreign leaders. Period. But not only did Obama bow, he specifically bowed to the leader of the Muslim country where Mecca lies. Why?

Then the White House ridiculously attempted to claim that the bow never happened in the first place. As if we never saw it.

Obama has consistently sided with Muslims against American allies. He has thrown Israel under the bus while supporting the idea of a "contiguous" Palestinian state, which by definition would mean splitting Israel in half.

He has barred Israel from taking action against Iran even as Iran goes nuclear.

He has backed a UN resolution condemning Israel's nuclear weapons and ignoring Iran's.

He has supported Raila Odinga, a radical Muslim politician in Kenya who has pledged to rewrite Kenya's Constitution to recognize Shariah as the only true law and establish Shariah courts in every Kenyan divisional headquarters.

He has abandoned Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury, an anti-Islamist in Bangladesh who has been imprisoned and prosecuted for supporting Israel's right to exist.

He has endorsed the mosque two blocks from Ground Zero despite the fact that the imam of the proposed "bridge-building" mosque is a radical Islamist who refuses to condemn Hamas and believes that the United States is responsible for 9/11.

He has endowed NASA with the glorious mission to "find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science … and math and engineering." Oi vey.

Oh, I guess we gloss over the fact that the Arabs took the concept of numbers and zero from India. But I digress.

Obama may not be a practicing Muslim, but he is a sellout to the radical Muslim world.

No wonder we are confused.

– based upon Townhall article by Ben Shapiro

Share

Of Bridges and Cliffs

No Comments

August 24, 2010 at 3:42 pmCategory:Muslim Hate

All we hear about the proposed Codoba imam, Feisal Abdul Rauf, is that he is a moderate and wants to build bridges. Yeah? Then why choose a name of conquest? Why pick a dedication date of September 11, 2011?

Meanwhile his wife is accusing us of outright Muslim hatred. Has she been talking to the far Left? Heck of a way to build bridges, with accusations and all.

Islam is a religion of conquest, whose purpose is to eradicate Christianity and Judaism. Look up Cordoba. The Koran teachings. The mass murder/genocide of Armenians and so many others:

tri 3,000,000  Bangladeshi Hindus Killed during the Pakistan-Bangladesh war in 1971.

tri From 1894 to 1896 Abdul Hamid, Sultan of the Ottoman Empire, killed 150,000  Armenian Christians.

tri In India, Sikh Guru Tegh Bahadur along with his disciples was burned to death by the Moghul ruler Aurangzeb in 1675. Another Sikh, Bhai Mati Das was sawn into right and left halves while he was still alive.

tri In July 1974, 4,000 Christians living in Cyprus were killed by Fahri Koroturk, president of Turkey and his Islamic army.

tri From 1843 to 1846 10,000 Assyrian Christians including women and children were massacred by the Muslims.

tri From 1915 to 1918 750,000  Assyrians were killed in the name of Islamic Jihad.

tri In 1933 thousands of Assyrian villagers were murdered by the Iraqi soldiers in Northern Iraq.

tri Since 1990 more than 10,000 Kashmiri Hindus have been brutally murdered by Islamic fundamentalists.

tri Over 280,000 Ugandans killed during the reign of Idi Amin from 1971 to 1979.

tri Over 30,000 Mauritanians have been killed by the Islamic dictators since 1960.

tri In 1980, 20,000 Syrians were murdered under the rule of Hafez Al-Assad, President of Syria.

tri Since 1992 120,000 Algerians have been murdered by the Islamic fundamentalist army.

So much for a religion of peace, huh?

So let us look at the actual words of Faisal Rauf:

We tend to forget, in the West, that the United States has more Muslim blood on its hands than al Qaida has on its hands of innocent non Muslims.You may remember that the US-led sanctions against Iraq led to the death of over half a million Iraqi children. This has been documented by the United Nations."

The bridges he wants to build are to the Muslim (Mafia) Brotherhood.

We need a Charles Martell or even a Vlad Tepes.

Share

Rauf Reality

1 Comment

August 22, 2010 at 7:47 amCategory:Uncategorized

Share

Muslim Hatred and Intolerance

No Comments

August 17, 2010 at 8:42 pmCategory:Islamo-Facism | Muslim Hate | Obama

Non-Muslims are barred from entering the cities of Mecca and Medina (forget about building synagogues or churches!) because according to the Koran, their infidel feet are unfit to touch the ground. This is not an al-Qaeda principle. Nor is it an “Islamist” principle. It is Islam, pure and simple.

“Truly the pagans are unclean,” instructs the Koran’s Sura 9:28, “so let them not . . . approach the Sacred Mosque.” This attitude is enforced, not by jihadist terrorists (though them too), but by the Saudi government. And it is enforced not because of some eccentric sense of Saudi nationalism. The only law of Saudi Arabia is sharia, the law of Islam.

Sunni scholarly commentary in the version of the Koran officially produced by the Saudi government explains, only Muslims are sufficiently “strict in cleanliness, as well as in purity of mind and heart, so that their word can be relied upon.” Thus, only they may enter the holy cities.

Shiite teaching is quite an insight: Iraq’s “moderate” Ayatollah Ali Sistani explains the touching of non-Muslims is discouraged, because they are considered to be in the same “unclean” category as “urine, feces, semen, dead bodies, blood, dogs, pigs, alcoholic liquors, and the sweat of an animal who persistently eats [unclean things].”

Hey, I am honored to be compared to a dog. I should have such a pure heart and offer the unconditional love that they give us every day.

And Obama continues to kiss their butt. The Greek Orthodox church which WAS DESTROYED in the attack is not being allowed to rebuild!  Why?  Where is the religious freedom?

And still the media is "preaching" to us about religious tolerance. Where is the Muslim tolerance? Oh yeah. They have NONE!

We build monuments to events. Muslims build monuments on top of conquered places. Look it up. It is true. And "Cordoba" is one of those built on top of a church in Spain.

And this one here is another "Cordoba" to mark the conquest of….? Is not their dedication date of September 11, 2011 say it all? Why this location and why that date?

Build a dog kennel there. They make better neighbors.

Share

Kagan Pro Sharia Law

No Comments

July 27, 2010 at 9:00 amCategory:Uncategorized

sharia law

Islamists are seeking to spread Shariah law by pushing financial institutions to establish Shariah Compliant Funds for investment.

These funds follow the prescriptions of Shariah law in their investments and collect 2.5 percent of the principal that they donate somewhere, PLUS  they fine recipients of their investment 7 percent for transgressions of Shariah law.

Whoa!  Do you want to be subject to this barbaric law? Forget that for a minute — what about separation of religion and state? Does it not apply to all religions – or only to Christians?  Speak out!  Demand of your senator NOT to confirm Kagan!

Most major banks in the U.S. and Europe have established Shariah Compliant Funds, and they had almost $1 trillion under management by 2007 — and likely more today.

At Harvard, Elena Kagan "proceeded to forge the law schools' 'Islamic Finance Project.' " Its purpose, according to McCarthy, was "to promote Shariah compliance in the U.S. financial sector."

Indeed, when Harvard's president, Larry Summers — now in the Obama administration — accepted a $20 million donation for the creation of a program of studies of Islam's history and Shariah law, Kagan raised no objection. The donation came from Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, a billionaire investor whose contribution of $10 million to the Twin Towers fund was refused by New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani because bin Talal had blamed the 9/11 attack on American foreign policy.

Harvard Law School now has three Saudi-funded institutions devoted to the study of Shariah.

Kagan, as a Supreme Court justice, will be required to rule frequently on possible applications of Shariah law in the United States. She has already noted that she welcomes "good ideas wherever they originate" and is open to applications of foreign law to the interpretation of U.S. statutes and common law.

In fact, a lawsuit seeking to ban Shariah Compliance Funds in banks that accepted TARP money (as violating the First Amendment separation of church and state) is now making its way up to the Supreme Court. Kagan cannot be trusted to rule dispassionately on this case, nor can we rely on her to exclude Shariah law from American jurisprudence.

For this reason — if for no other — senators should vote no on her confirmation.

Share