Tag-Archive for » rationing «

Nov
21

Dick Morris
Joseph Stubbs, president of the American College of Physicians — the second-largest doctors' group in the country — confirms that "the supply of doctors just won't be there" for the 30 million new patients. This doctor shortage is "already a catastrophic crisis," Stubbs noted that underserved areas in the U.S. currently need almost 17,000 new primary care physicians even before Obama's proposals are enacted.

In the meantime, according to Bloomberg News, a 2009 survey by Merritt Hawkins & Associates, a recruiting and research firm in Irving, Texas, found that "the average waiting time to see a family-medicine doctor in Boston…is 63 days, the most among the 15 cities" surveyed. By comparison, in Miami, it was only seven days.  Boston's longer wait is because of their  healthcare reformthe one Obama is copying.

Bloomberg reported that "as many as half of doctors in the state have closed their practices to new patients, forcing many of the newly insured to turn to emergency rooms for care."

Alan Goroll, a professor at Harvard Medical School says that we cannot increase the number of insured unless you have the doctors to treat them all. Makes sense, no?

Indeed, the report found that the Medicare cuts contained in the House-passed bill are likely to "prove so costly to hospitals and nursing homes that they could stop taking Medicare altogether."

As details of the doctor shortage, Medicare cuts, tax increases, penalties for no insurance, shallow subsidies and high costs for the uninsured all leak out, more and more Americans are developing qualms about the bill.

But within Congress, the momentum is the other way as the bill hurtles toward December passage in the Senate — regardless of the facts or common sense.

Of course, they are tyring to lessen the burden of patients upon doctorts by denying care from, the start. See And So It Begins

source: Dick Morris.com

  • Share/Bookmark
Nov
19

…the RATIONING

mammograms to be denied

The new rationing….er, government recommendations, is saying that breast self-exams are worthless and doctors are to stop teaching women how to do them.

Has the Taliban invaded? Sounds like women are now not to be educated and basically, kept down!

This reversal from a mere 6 months ago wants mammograms to be started after the age of 50 and two entire years between them — to save costs. Oh, yeah, they are babbling about false positives and saving women the anxiety of testing. But through the smoke and mirrors, they are RATIONING and picking on women as their first target.

Defies Logic and All Medical Advice

These guidelines are so transparent — the only thing transparent in Obama World. But it means the death of women. It means motherless children. Because we are now reduced to a sum of money.

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, a government panel of doctors and scientists who have sold out, say now that early screenings often lead to false alarms and unneeded biopsies.

It also identifies women with aggressive early cancers whose lives will be saved. Wait until 50 and they are dead. But then, they won't need any medical services and won't cost the Government and money. Ah — Mission Accomplished.

You have been warned.

  • Share/Bookmark
Nov
18

Health Care TrickeryDid you think that was being discussed as something that might happen? That boards of people might decide your treatments in the future?

Hold on to your hats folks because it is already here! It was snuck into Obama's stimulus bill…like a thief in the night. If they went so far to hide it, you can bet it is not good for us.

Rationing and Denying Access to Health Care

Both of these already violate the Hippocratic Oath as they cause harm to the patient.

If that is NOT enough, there is the final penalty, DEATH. The core of this Obama, Pelosi, Reid plan is to cut costs by denying and rationing care. This same method in other countries has lead to premature deaths. In a Supreme Court of Canada decision in Chaoulli v. Quebec in June of 2005, the Chief Justice and Justice Major noted that the evidence  showed beyond a doubt that many Quebec residents face significant delays in obtaining treatment in the public health care system resulting in adverse physical and psychological consequences:

“Access to a waiting list is not access to health care….[T]here is unchallenged evidence that in some serious cases, patients die as a result of waiting lists for public health care. Where lack of timely health care can result in death, Section 7 protection of life itself is engaged.”

The rationing of care in the Two Part Obama Health Care Plan is implemented through a Council, equivalent to the National Health Care Board in the British Health Care System.  The name given to this panel is The Federal Coordinating Council For Comparative Effectiveness Research (“Federal Council”).  (Section 9201 H.R. 1 Version of the Stimulus Bill.)  

These people are in place!

President Obama has already appointed the fifteen-member Federal Council.  According to the Stimulus Bill, p. 152, all members of the Council must be “senior federal officers or employees.”   Thus, medical treatment will be dispensed by a group of bureaucrats from their ivory towers, not by the hands-on practitioners in the presence of the patients. The council was funded with $1.1 BILLION from the stimulus bill. 

This is ALREADY IN PLACE.

It becomes evident that the Obama health Care plan as advanced by Pelosi, Reid and the Democrat majority in the House and Senate is NOT about bringing affordability and availability to the health care system.  This insidious Plan is about wresting control of every American’s life and death through penalties, punishments, taxes and coercion.

When I became a physician I took an Oath to “Do No Harm”. This legislation inflicts HARM on every American and must be stopped and the health care portion of the stimulus bill must be repealed.  If not, you and your family will become shackled to the Federal Government.

Dr David Janda

  • Share/Bookmark
Aug
06

Emanuel brothers

If you are very young, or middle-aged to old, you die. No bull, just facts.

Ezekiel Emanuel (above left)) believes doctors try too hard to apply the Hippocratic Oath to everyone as equally as possible, which is what drives up costs.What?

Instead — Emanuel says we need to ration basic, guaranteed care to only those who can fully participate in society.

Uh, yeah, and WHO determines that?

He writes: "Savings will require changing how doctors think about their patients: Doctors take the Hippocratic Oath too seriously, "as an imperative to do everything for the patient regardless of the cost or effects on others" (Journal of the American Medical Association, June 18, 2008).

So, according to Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, health care advisor to President Obama, the elderly with dementia and the young who have neurological disorders should be sacrificed for the common good.

Which concentration camp did this "doctor" crawl out from? Is this looking more like Hitler now?

All this rhetoric (AKA LIES) that no one will be denied services are bull. Besides the fact that Obama wants a single-payer system, and the two most prominent such systems already deny care – EUGENICS! – his top people want this rationing. Why are the blindfolds on?

This is the system they want for us! So if you are a baby or over 55, you are nothing and you do not warrant health care.

England and Canada already deny care to some patients to save money. But what the Emanuel brothers intend for us, is even worse. No bull, just facts.

We, the patients and the loved ones of patients want our doctors to do everything possible, right? That so-called doctor does not! He wants doctors to forget needs of their patients and consider social justice, such as whether the money could be better spent on somebody else.

Many doctors are horrified by this notion – as YOU should be too!

Emanuel, however, believes that "communitarianism" should guide decisions on who gets care. He says medical care should be reserved for the non-disabled, not given to those "who are irreversibly prevented from being or becoming participating citizens . . . An obvious example is not guaranteeing health services to patients with dementia" (Hastings Center Report, Nov.-Dec. ‘96).

Obese patients cannot get bypass or other care because they are deemed not as worthy. Where would you fall into that scale of worthiness? How about your mother or grandmother? Or your child with autism?

Translation: Don’t give much care to a grandmother with Parkinson’s or a child with cerebral palsy.

He explicitly defends discrimination against older patients: "Unlike allocation by sex or race, allocation by age is not invidious discrimination; every person lives through different life stages rather than being a single age. Even if 25-year-olds receive priority over 65-year-olds, everyone who is 65 years now was previously 25 years" (Lancet, Jan. 31).

So, people, the questions is very simple – is that what you want?

Fight Back! STOP THEM

Deadly Doctors

  • Share/Bookmark