Tag: Government

California Leads Stupidity

No Comments

August 15, 2011 at 12:09 pmCategory:Government

Matress Police

Here comes the Mattress Police. Yup, Californians are at it again. Is there too much sun out there? Probably too much weed — but I digress.

The State of California is facing a staggering $26 BILLION dollar debt, and this nonense is part of the reason.

They passed a LAW banning flat sheets. In fact, it is now a crime to use a flat sheet instead of a fitted sheet.

Have they nothing better to do? They seem to have lost their ability to reason or perhaps they have all been taken over by those Body Snatchers.
gryffin

Share

Government Failure

No Comments

January 15, 2011 at 8:37 amCategory:Commentary | Government

Proof the "government" is useless and indeed, dangerous.

Bobby Herring and his wife, Amanda, have been active in providing meals for Houston’s (TX) homeless population.

But two weeks ago, the government shut them down and for a nonsensical reason – not having a permit which requires and "certified kitchen".

Hold on… does this mean we have to shut down every home kitchen because it is not certified by local yokels?  My goodness, how have we survived all these thousands of years?

“We don’t really know what they want, we just think that they don’t want us down there feeding people,” Bobby said.

Kathy Barton, a spokeswoman for the Health and Human Services Department, told the Chronicle exactly what “they” are looking for: food that’s prepared in a “certified” kitchen under the watch of a “certified” food manager.

The regulations and permit are essential when it comes to the homeless, Barton told the Chronicle, because “poor people are the most vulnerable to foodborne illness and also are the least likely to have access to health care.”

I guess they are not vulnerable to starvation…. I'm just saying.

I am a certified food manager and I say she is an idiot backing a ridiculous rule.

Another example of government failure.

Share

Net Neutrality

No Comments

December 21, 2010 at 9:20 amCategory:Government

Seemingly harmless term for Big Brother to watch all you do on the Net.

Republican Commissioner Robert McDowell, who has long opposed Net neutrality regulation, said in an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal on Monday that the new rules are trying to fix a problem that doesn't exist.

"On this winter solstice, we will witness jaw-dropping interventionist chutzpah as the FCC bypasses branches of our government in the dogged pursuit of needless and harmful regulation," McDowell wrote. "The darkest day of the year may end up marking the beginning of a long winter's night for Internet freedom."

He went on to say:

"Nothing is broken and needs fixing, however. The Internet has been open and freedom-enhancing since it was spun off from a government research project in the early 1990s. Its nature as a diffuse and dynamic global network of networks defies top-down authority. Ample laws to protect consumers already exist."

Read more: http://news.cnet.com/8301-30686_3-20026236-266.html#ixzz18l8VozpV

Share

Assange

No Comments

December 7, 2010 at 4:18 pmCategory:Commentary | Hoaxes and Lies

Julian Paul Assange is an Australian journalist, publisher and Internet activist best known as the WikiLeaks guy who has gotten hold of "secret" documents and is making them public, bit by bit.

At first I thought of him as a traitor, even though he is Australian, but you know what I mean.

The latest batch of diplomatic communiques was interesting though.

Then Eric Holder spoke out against him. He's OK with the Black Panthers threatening folks, but….

His accuser in the sex offense is very suspect and flatly do not believe her, rather, that she is setting him up. She held a party in his honor the night after the alleged incident. Yada Yada. It was consentual and the case was closed in August.

So I have come around 180 degrees waiting for what he has to say next. I believe his revelations could enlighten us all on the Powers that move us around like pawns in their game.

Wanted by Interpol

Share

The Uncivility of Barack Obama

No Comments

November 8, 2010 at 2:32 pmCategory:Government | Hoaxes and Lies

The Uncivility of Barack Obama

"We don't mind the Republicans joining us," Obama taunted a few weeks ago. "They can come for the ride, but they gotta sit in back."

"They're counting on young people staying home and union members staying home and black folks staying home," the fear-mongering agent of hope and change jeered on the campaign trail last month.

"You would think they'd be saying thank you," he sneered last April, when millions turned out for the nationwide Tax Day tea party protests.

"I want them just to get out of the way" and "don't do a lot of talking," he scoffed in response to prescient critics of the federal trillion-dollar stimulus boondoggle.

In addition to labeling GOP opponents of his open-borders policies "enemies" who needed to be "punished" by Latino voters, Obama accused them — that is, us — of lacking patriotism. "Those aren't the kinds of folks who represent our core American values," he told viewers of the Spanish-language network Univision.

And So It Multiplies

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer called regular folks who voiced an opinion regarding the federal health care takeover in the town halls of 2009 "un-American," too. "Astroturf, jinned up". Remember? "Drowning out [voicing] opposing views is simply un-American," Pelosi and Hoyer blasted.

This from the woman who called for a vengeful government investigation of grassroots opponents of the Ground Zero mosque. "Abuse of Power" is what I call it.

Obama's pal Rep. Alan Grayson of Florida, whom the president hailed as an "outstanding" member of Congress, accused Republicans of wanting elderly people to "die quickly" and of presiding over a "holocaust in America." Vice President Joe Biden hailed Grayson as a "guy who doesn't back away from a fight, and doesn't back down from what he believes in" and told him at a fundraiser: "We owe you one, buddy." No mention of Grayson's smear of a female Federal Reserve adviser as a "K Street whore."

In California, entrenched incumbent jerk Pete Stark derided immigration enforcement activists at a town hall by asking: "Who are you going to kill today?" To an elderly constituent who opposed the health care bill, Stark retorted: "I wouldn't dignify you by peeing on your leg. It wouldn't be worth wasting the urine."

As voters who have been maligned by the ruling majority as stupid, unwashed, racist, selfish and violent headed to the polls Tuesday, Democrats released "talking points" attacking Republican leaders who "are not willing to compromise." But "no compromise" is exactly the message that un-American Americans delivered to Washington this campaign season:

No more compromising deals behind closed doors. No more compromising bailouts in times of manufactured crisis. No more compromising conservative principles for D.C. party elites. No more compromising the American economy for left-wing special interests. No more compromising transparency and ethics for bureaucratic self-preservation.

Let us be clear, in case it hasn't fully sunk into the minds of Obama and the trash-talking Democrats yet: You can take your faux olive branch and shove it. Thank you.

Michelle Malkin
 

Share

Convoluted

No Comments

August 28, 2010 at 8:02 amCategory:Marxism | Obama

Mona CharenPresident Obama has a weakness for thinking in categories — compartmentalizing. For someone who provokes swoons among liberals for his great intellect, he has repeatedly evidenced an unsophisticated, one might even say simple-minded, view of the world: Workers good; bosses exploitative. Borrowers good; lenders bad. Patients good; insurance companies bad. Again and again, the president and his spokesmen have justified their expansions of government power as efforts to help those who "through no fault of their own" find themselves in difficulties.

Most politicians drag this "I'll take care of you" rhetoric out during campaigns, but Obama has institutionalized it in policy.He has a veritable Ph.D (piled high and deep) degree in it.

One of those piles — the Home Affordable Modification Program — was a total failure.

Recall that in February 2009, President Obama proposed to solve a "crisis unlike we've ever known." It wasn't, the president insisted, that anyone had made poor decisions — [of course not - let's not confuse the people with "accountability" here].

"It begins with a young family … They save up … They choose a home that feels like the perfect place to start a life. They secure a fixed-rate mortgage at a reasonable rate, and they make a down payment, and they make their mortgage payments each month. They are as responsible as anyone could ask them to be." But then someone loses a job, a spouse has his or her hours cut, or a child becomes sick.

Um, isn't that called "Life"?  Life happens as a result of the decisions we make. Such a simple concept which frees us because we know we are in charge of our lives. Don't like your circumstances? Make different choices.

We live on the planet Earth, not in a bubble. One cannot protect people from"Life" — or their decisions — or the consequences of such decisions.

Neil Barofsky, the special inspector general for the Troubled Assets Relief Program (SIGTARP for those who speak Washingtonese) blasted the program in a July report:

"Treasury's refusal to provide meaningful goals for this important program is a fundamental failure of transparency and accountability that makes it far more difficult for the American people and their representatives in Congress to assess whether the program's benefits are worth its very substantial cost.

"The American people are essentially being asked to shoulder an additional $50 billion of national debt without being told, more than 16 months after the program's announcement, how many people Treasury hopes to actually help stay in their homes as a result of these expenditures, how many people are intended to be helped through other subprograms, and how the program is performing against those expectations and goals. Without such clearly defined standards, positive comments regarding the progress or success of HAMP are simply not credible, and the growing public suspicion that the program is an outright failure will continue to spread.

In contrast to the Obama morality play, the foreclosure crisis was not a conspiracy of the rich and powerful against dutiful homeowners reliably making their monthly payments. It was the result of multiple stupidity by government, bankers, and individuals. Obama's instinct to insulate people from the consequences of their bad decisions (and yes, sometimes bad luck) amounts to subsidizing failure. The results are coming in daily — persistent high unemployment, an anemic recovery, and billions upon billions of wasted taxpayer's money.

– based upon article by Mona Charen

Share