Global Warming | Gryffn Musings

Irrational Ideaology

December 22, 2009 at 10:28 amCategory:Global Warming | Religion

Vaclav Klaus

"I lived in a communist world where politicians told us what to do," Klaus said. "I don't think politicians or presidents should suggest to firms what to do. That has always been a mistake."

This was stated by Czech President Vaclav Klaus, who has been a long-time a global warming skeptic. He warns that they should not dictate to humanity how to live based on an "irrational ideology," which is a by-product of ridiculous political correctness.

Global warming is a "new religion," not a science, he said. This is a religion which tells us that the people are responsible for the current, very small increase in temperatures. And they should be punished."

Klaus, the second president of the Czech Republic since the fall of communism, is often called the Margaret Thatcher of Central Europe. In the interview, he sounded more like Winston Churchill, vowing to defend liberty and freedom from those who would restrain global economic growth.

"I'm absolutely convinced that the very small global warming we are experiencing is the result of natural causes," Klaus told FoxNews.com. "It's a cyclical phenomenon in the history of the Earth. The role of man is very small, almost negligible."

"We'll be the victims of irrational ideology. They will try to dictate to us how to live, what to do, how to behave," Klaus said. "What to eat, travel, and what my children should have. This is something that we who lived in the communist era for most of our lives — we still feel very strongly about. We are very sensitive in this respect. And we feel various similarities in their way of arguing or not arguing. In the way of pushing ahead ideas regardless of rational counter-arguments."

Klaus, who graduated from the University of Economics in Prague, and also studied in the U.S. at Cornell University, worked in banking during the communist era. He was also an outspoken reformer during the "Prague Spring" in the late 1960s, a cultural revolt against totalitarian ideology.

Another Climate Scam/Sham FlimFlam

No Comments

December 21, 2009 at 9:20 amCategory:Uncategorized

A new Ice Age?

Eerily reminiscent of the many Ice Age representations we have seen — is it prophetic? After all the Earth has been COOLING for the past 11 years. Ya hear that Al Gore?

Another scandal surrounding the made-up global warming scam. How can the scientists at the Meteorological Office in Britain ignore one of the largest cold areas of the planet — namely, Siberia? It takes a Russian think tank and Vladimir Putin to point this out? He charges that the UK scientist actually 'manipulated' climate change figures.

As the Copenhagen summit comes to a climax on Friday, it was pointed out that Siberian weather statistics were selected in a way that masks evidence not showing global warming. There's the spin folks.

The Moscow-based Institute of Economic Analysis (IEA) claimed the Hadley Centre used statistics from weather stations in Russian and Siberia that fitted its theory of global warming, and ignoring those that did not.

The Russian meteorological station data did not substantiate the global-warming theory,' stated semi-official RIA Novosti news agency.

Futhermore, Novosti says the Hadley Centre 'probably tampered with Russian-climate data' by using statistics from only a quarter of available weather stations in its report.

'Over 40 per cent of Russian territory was not included in global-temperature calculations for reasons other than the lack of meteorological stations and observations,' claimed Kommersant newspaper, owned by pro-Kremlin oligarch Allisher Usmanov.

It was alleged the Hadley data known as HadCRUT used incomplete findings from Russian met stations 'far more often than those providing complete observations'.

'When choosing between stations with breaks in measurements and those with regular measurements in same region, HadCRUT would include the station with gaps in information but with a more obvious picture of warming,' said Kommersant.

And data was also skewed to include stations in large populated areas more frequently than the correct data of remote stations.

One account of the 21 page report said: 'The scale of global warming was exaggerated due to temperature distortions for Russia accounting for 12.5 per cent of the world's land mass.'

Meanwhile, the kool-aid drinking fools like Germany's Angela Merkel continue to criticize the US – that's us folks, you and me – and demanding more.

Can't we just tell them all to go to hell? There they can pat themselves on the back and nod in agreement that they have finally found their "global warming".

Copenhagen Climate Terrorists

No Comments

December 12, 2009 at 7:42 pmCategory:Global Warming

Climate Terrorists

More than 25,000 marched in protest of the U.N. climate conference in Copenhagen, demanding more aid from the United States to combat global warming.

“Pay the climate debt, America,” Dustin, a protester from Taiwan, said. “We think the world needs an ambitious climate treaty. My country is suffering from climate change. Several villages were buried this year.”

Rik Lindhardt from Sweden added: “I think the U.S. and China are fighting over small things and no one wants to take responsibility. They can both do more.”

You see what this climate hoax has gotten us. A scapegoat and something/now someone to blame for regular weather phenomena. Hurricanes, tornadoes, floods all just happen folks! Do not build in a flood plain, on a hillside, at the foot of a volcano. These are life lessons and not global warming.

Americans are struggling more and more just to survive and now we have people in other countries demanding money from us. It is insane! See what this climate hoax of Al Gore and Obama has brought us.

Both of them are rich and have no problem paying their bills. No giving up of meds or food for them. No, it's the rest of us they want to steal from.

So what does Obama do in the face of such outrageous demands? He pledges several billion dollars to help vulnerable, developing countries deal with the effects of climate change. European Union nations have agreed to give about $3.6 billion.

Poor and vulnerable nations, like Bangladesh and several Pacific Island nations, want a $200 billion commitment so they can temper the potential impacts of global warming – ocean flooding, drought, disappearing forests and increased diseases.

“I don’t like it, it’s not enough,” said Anne Heupel of Copenhagen. “They don’t want to sacrifice for the developing countries. The whole world needs to stand together.”

And there IS NO GLOBAL WARMING!!! Change, yes — there will always be changeable weather. Always, but we don't have to pay someone else because they had a heavy rain. That is just stupid.

The World Bank says the developed nations should offer upwards of $50 billion a year to "kick start" a global climate mitigation.

But here is NO GLOBAL WARMING!!! Temperatures have DECLINED the past 11 years. Wake up folks – oh, then they would have no reason to demand money of us. Well, how about the coming Ice Age. You could demand money for that!

But I say NO. I am not paying you a red cent, you parasites.

Obama has pledged a 17 percent reduction of greenhouse gases below the 2005 benchmark by 2020. That is just 4 percent below 1990 levels. Most scientists say the world needs to cut those emissions from the 1990 levels by 25 percent to 40 percent to avert a climate crisis.

“They can do better. To save the climate the American president should be more aggressive,” said Tanya Griesner from Hamburg, Germany. “We all have to do better."

Shut up and focus on your own country. You have no right to demand anything of me.

Germany and most European nations say they are willing to cut their emissions from 1990 levels by 30 percent if the U.S. would agree. A cut of 15 percent would cost the typical American family at least $1,300 a year, according to CBO figures from last year.

Oh, and the latest insane statement that CO2 is poison. Huh? Without CO2 the trees would die. They NEED CO2 to produce oxygen – something we NEED — remember? Without CO2, we all die!

When did outright lies and untruths become so accepted?

Not everyone agreed with the protesters. A young economist from Copenhagen watched as the crowd march by.

“In a hundred years people will say, why did we do so much for the climate, when you could have done so much for the people starving," he said.

Yes, it is stupidity and the New Religion. Blinding all logic and rational thought, it can and will kill us all.

8 Stupid Solutions to Global Warming

1 Comment

December 4, 2009 at 7:57 pmCategory:Global Warming | Hoaxes and Lies

First, I beg to differ that the weather is anything other than it has always been – changeable!

Hoax, Lies, and Obfuscation.

So there are these wacky radical people who are determined to put us into the Ice Age. Yes, it only takes a couple of degrees more cooling — for we have been cooling for 11 years now — and it takes just a wee bit more to push us into an Ice Age.

I have always maintained that view and now we have some proof that this has all been contrived by folks like Al Gore, who profited greatly from all this, and other organizations. It all points to greed — money — the age-old cause of so much turmoil and pain to others.

1. Spray It Away

Some idiot wants to spray sulfur dioxide into the Earth's nearest atmospheric levels could bind with other chemicals to reflect sunlight from the Earth. Less sunlight hitting the surface means a cooler earth and another Ice Age.

This could work only too well, causing catastrophic weather changes in certain areas (such as sudden droughts). And you are using a pollutant!! What idiots.

2. Use Sunscreen

This wacky idea has a giant screen made of criss-crossing aluminum strands and putting it into space. The screen would act like a filter, preventing some infrared radiation from reaching the planet.

A 600,000 square mile screen? Launching it? Placing it into a precise position between the sun and Earth? We don't even have a working Space Shuttle replacement yet. Get real.

3. Scrub Like the Wind

This one wants a giant HEPA-like filter to take the carbon dioxide out of the air. Uh huh.

So how many filters do we need? And where are they to be placed — like we need thousands and thousands of acres. And there is one more thing — it will take energy to separate the CO2 from the capturing chemicals and that will only produces more CO2. Doesn't make sense, does it?

4. Plant Fake Trees

Oh lord. Fake trees to absorb carbon dioxide.

They would not even look like real trees and then what do we do with captured carbon dioxide?

5. Needs More Salt

More clouds; say goodbye to the sun.

Now they want to blow salt into the air to produce them. That would increase the chances of water vapor clinging to particles (the salt) and forming clouds.

So how do we get the salt way up there?

6. Needs More Iron

Iron powder dumped into the ocean promotes the rapid growth of plankton. Plankton eats CO2, so the more the better.

Hold on there — large amounts of plankton can destroy the underwater ecosystem, killing off other species as it consumes other nutrients. So it is starving ourselves. Not smart.

7. Get Stoned

Limestone (calcium carbonate) actually contains trapped carbon dioxide. So why not turn carbon dioxide into stone? Has anyone seen Medusa?

It takes nature thousands of years to harden chemicals into stones and we would need to mine huge amounts of minerals to mix with the carbon dioxide for this mineral carbonation to work. And then heating the mixture to the high temperatures required would take even more CO2-producing energy. Stupid, stupid, stupid.

8. Bury It

Let's filter it out and then pump it underground to store it? Better still, why not pump it into places where we're trying to push oil out of the ground?

Just one thing — it is way too expensive. The gas has to be captured, compressed, and then transported to the site of injection.
Just another thing — what if it escapes years from now? Trapped in cellars, carbon dioxide could be more lethal than radon.
Yup, another way to kill us all.

source

Global Warming Data Cooked

1 Comment

November 30, 2009 at 12:26 pmCategory:Global Warming | Hoaxes and Lies

earth Global Warming data thrown out — to hide the fact that the Earth is COOLING.

Scientists at the University of East Anglia have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based.

It means that other academics are not able to check basic calculations said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years. And that is also because the global tempos have DROPPED over the last 11 years. They want to hide all this because the Big Business of global warming is at stake!

The UEA’s Climatic Research Unit CRU was forced to reveal the loss following requests for the data under Freedom of Information legislation. Note: this was NOT voluntary.

The admission follows the leaking of a thousand private emails sent and received by Professor Phil Jones, the CRU’s director. In them he discusses thwarting climate sceptics seeking access to such data. See, he wants to HIDE it.

In a statement on its website, the CRU said: "We do not hold the original raw data but only the value-added (quality controlled and homogenized) data." In other words, the cooked data. The data they have already slanted to the outcome they want. Useless.

The CRU is the world’s leading center for reconstructing past climate and temperatures. Climate change sceptics have long been keen to examine exactly how its data were compiled. That is now impossible.

Shut 'em down. They are useless. They are DANGEROUS! We have idiots here trying to drop world temperatures (when they are already dropping). They could conceivably bring on another Ice Age. Oh yeah. That's real good.

Evidence Shows the Global Warming Hoax & Lies

No Comments

November 20, 2009 at 7:21 pmCategory:Global Warming

Greenland - AP photo

Thanks to hackers who broke into the servers at a British climate research center and have now leaked years worth of e-mail messages — including one that mentions a plan to "hide the decline," [in global temps -- like, we have a global cooling!]

The data is from the University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit (commonly called Hadley CRU), and Phil Jones, the head of the Hadley CRU, confirmed that the leaked data is real.

Same thing happened here. See Suppressed Climate Change Report

The Smoking Guns

**Manipulation of evidence:

I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.

**Private doubts about whether the world really is heating up:

The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t. The CERES data published in the August BAMS 09 supplement on 2008 shows there should be even more warming: but the data are surely wrong. Our observing system is inadequate.

**Suppression of evidence:

Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re AR4?

Keith will do likewise. He’s not in at the moment – minor family crisis.

Can you also email Gene and get him to do the same? I don’t have his new email address.

We will be getting Caspar to do likewise.

**Fantasies of violence against prominent Climate Sceptic scientists:

Next time I see Pat Michaels at a scientific meeting, I’ll be tempted to beat the crap out of him. Very tempted.

**Attempts to disguise the inconvenient truth of the Medieval Warm Period (MWP):

……Phil and I have recently submitted a paper using about a dozen NH records that fit this category, and many of which are available nearly 2K back–I think that trying to adopt a timeframe of 2K, rather than the usual 1K, addresses a good earlier point that Peck made w/ regard to the memo, that it would be nice to try to “contain” the putative “MWP”, even if we don’t yet have a hemispheric mean reconstruction available that far back….

Telegraph UK

So all of us who claimed all this warming data was "cooked" — well, we are right! There is no global warming threatening the planet. Get over it already.

And then the UN wants to fight non-existant global warming with condoms.

Oh yeah, now there's a solution. But here's a motive for all this deception….

A United Nations document on "climate change" envisions a huge reordering of the world economy, likely involving trillions of dollars in wealth transfer [from US to them], millions of job losses and gains, new taxes, industrial relocations, new tariffs and subsidies, and complicated payments for greenhouse gas abatement schemes and carbon taxes — all under the supervision of the world body.

Those and other results are discussed in a UN "information note" on the fallout of the measures that industrialized countries will be forced to take (like shelling out trillions to other countries) after it is signed by December 2009. The Obama administration has said it supports the treaty process.

U.N. 'Climate Change' Plan Would Likely Shift Trillions to Form New World Economy

Older Entries