Dec
23

You do know that Obama's health care bill will NOT provide benefits for anyone until 2013 — even though you will be paying taxes for it and getting the restrictions already — right?

No Gain, but plenty of Pain, for the next three years.
  
This "suffer now, benefit later" is the byproduct of the Administration's sleight of hand in specifying ten years worth of cuts and taxes in the legislation, but deferring its benefits for the first four years.  That means SIX years of spending with TEN years of taxing. That is why it SEEMS deficit neutral, but it really isn't.

Hopefully, Democrats who flagrantly ignored the American people and voted for this monstrosity will face immediate political repercussions.

The harshest of these backlashes will come from the elderly who will suddenly visit their doctors and be told "no" when they ask for therapies or treatments.  The rationing of medical care will start immediately on enactment and, one hopes, the outraged phone calls will start to descend on those whose votes enabled it.

The first "no" will hit the ten million elderly who now rely on Medicare Advantage to pay for the care Medicare itself does not cover.  In a payoff to AARP, Obama gutted this program in his bill, ending over $100 billion in federal premium subsidies.  These ten million voters will get the grim news that their premiums are going up and their benefits dropping early in 2010.  The goal, of course, is to force them to drop Medicare Advantage and sign up, instead, for Medigap insurance — offered, not coincidentally, by the AARP — which provides less coverage at higher cost.

Young people without health insurance can expect to start writing $750 annual checks to Washington to pay the fines written into the bill.  (And, after the Conference Committee finishes its work, the fines may be higher).

All Americans will soon find their insurance premiums rising as a result of the bill.  The young, uninsured will not buy policies.  Why should they?  Why not just pay the $750 fines each year?  Why pay between 2% and 10% of their household income before subsidies kick in?  It makes no financial sense for anyone making more than $30,000 to pay for coverage.
  
The difference in cost will, of course, be thrown onto families throughout America who will see their health insurance premiums increase. 

I will end up with nothing, just like I have now.
  
Change we can believe in – not

(Dick Morris)

  • Share/Bookmark

More

Category: Health Care  Tags:
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> <font color="" face="" size=""> <span style="">